Here is a detailed description of the many errors in the above HowTheWorldWorks video on YouTube:

Again, in this video, you claim I "deliberately distort the facts," but, not only do you fail to show any factual distortions on my part, but you actually make multiple errors of your own in your attempt tp show my supposed distortions. Your main error in this video is ignoring the huge amount of evidence of Fox News bias I provided, especially the dozens and dozens of videos on my Fox New bias playlist at http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A3BD2524FE99BD4D

In fact, at both the beginning (0:27) and end (6:16) of this video, you edit the video in such a way as to avoid parts of my video where I cite my Fox News bias playlist as evidence of Fox News bias even though you are supposedly asking for evidence of Fox News bias (e.g. at 6:05).

Because you fail to address and you even avoid all this evidence of Fox News bias, you never really address the main argument in my video that, instead of reporting on Anita Dunn's comments as being about Fox News and its bias, Fox News tried to reframe the story as being about White House attacks on the media in general.

For example, at 0:55, instead of addressing my point (and Anita Dunn's point) about Fox News bias against Barack Obama during the 2008 election, you just repeat some of the partisan talking points about ACORN and Bill Ayers that Fox News broadcast in 2008 without providing any support for your statements (no "links in the sidebar," again).

Similarly, at 1:40, you fail to address the evidence of Fox News bias I provided and instead make the unsupported claim that "Fox News is the only organization willing to expose the current Administration for its leftist policies."

Further, instead of providing evidence to back up this claim and instead of addressing all the evidence of Fox News bias I provided, starting at 2:12, you show a clip of Anita Dunn talking about how the Obama political campaign used online videos to get the message of the campaign more directly into news stories. You then follow this clip by making the erroneous statement at 2:47 that "a news organization is an organization that does whatever Anita Dunn wants it to do" but you show nothing actually supporting that statement.

Next, at 2:59 you make the erroneous (and irrelevant) claim that if Anita Dunn's comment were not a "rogue operation" then "Obama approved it," but it's also possible the comments were just approved by David Axelrod and/or Rahm Emmanuel. In any case, you never show anything wrong with the comments even if they were approved by the President.

You also claim at 3:50 that "the goal all along is to make sure other stations don't expose the administration like Fox News has been doing," but you don't provide any examples or other evidence. Also, like Fox News and without any basis, you call the administration "Nixonian," but you again, fail to address and you even avoid all the evidence of Fox News bias I provide and so you never really address the argument in my video that, instead of reporting on Anita Dunn's comments as being about Fox News and its bias, Fox News tried to reframe the story as being about White House attacks on the media in general.

Similarly, at 4:15, when I point out David Axelrod's "honesty" for being candid about the bias at Fox News, you claim he's "providing spin and intimidation for the administration," but you provide nothing to back up your claim and because you again fail to address and even avoid all the evidence of Fox News bias I provided, you never really address the argument in my video that, instead of reporting on Anita Dunn's comments as being about Fox News and its bias, Fox News tried to reframe the story as being about White House attacks on the media in general.

You again show the result of your erroneous avoidance of all the evidence of bias I have shown on Fox News when at 4:35 you claim that the administration "smears" Fox News by pointing out Fox News bias and, because you again fail to address and even avoid all the evidence of Fox News bias I provided, you never really address the argument in my video that, instead of reporting on Anita Dunn's comments as being about Fox News and its bias, Fox News tried to reframe the story as being about White House attacks on the media in general.

In addition, at 5:16, you again claim the actions of the Obama Administration "are like the Nixon Administration" even though the clip of Nixon at 5:25 shows Nixon reacting to unfavorable coverage (NOT bias) from the NY Times by saying the NY Times would be "cut off... forever" and the Obama Administration did not "cut off" Fox News and even the Fox News interview requests that were deferred were not deferred "forever."

Next, at 5:44, after I point out that the way Fox News turned "a story about Fox News bias into a story about Obama being supposedly Nixonian kind of proves the point Anita Dunn and David Axelrod were making," you call my argument a "circular argument" because you again fail to address and even avoid all the evidence of Fox News bias I provided, so you never really address the argument in my video that, instead of reporting on Anita Dunn's comments as being about Fox News and its bias, Fox News tried to reframe the story as being about White House attacks on the media in general.

In fact, you even failed to address and avoided all the evidence of Fox News bias I provided despite explicitly asking at 6:05 "what evidence do you have for the truth of these charges?"

Instead, at 6:17, you attempt to rebut my characterization of Media Matters and Brave New Films as "professional," by stating your opinion that they are "extreme leftist hack organizations" which you don't support with any evidence and which, in any case, does not rebut my characterization of them as professional (why couldn't they be professional extreme leftist hacks?). You further claim they "lie on a constant basis" but, again, you provide no evidence to back up your claim (no "links in the sidebar") and, because, at 6:16, you edit the video in such a way as to avoid parts of my video where I cite my Fox News bias playlist as evidence of Fox News bias, you again fail to address and even avoid all the evidence of Fox News bias I provided, so you never really address the argument in my video that, instead of reporting on Anita Dunn's comments as being about Fox News and its bias, Fox News tried to reframe the story as being about White House attacks on the media in general.

So, again, nowhere in this video do you show that I "distorted" any fact, never mind that I "deliberately distorted" anything and, again, your video is factually and logically flawed.

I hope that helps clear up you misunderstanding and

thanks for the video :-)