Here is a detailed description of the many errors in the above HowTheWorldWorks video on YouTube:

 

First, at 0:23 you say I "deliberately distort the facts," repeating the claim in your title, but you never show any fact I have distorted.

 

At 0:30 you claim I made a video "attacking [you]" but show a picture of a video I made about Fox News bias that includes a short clip at the end pointing out your over-the-top rhetoric in a video you had just made. You also fail to mention I made this video AFTER you publicly called me a "liar" in the comment section of the video you had just made in a reply to geegee1380 and said I "lied" in a reply to kraker109 but then never showed I said anything that was untrue. Your false accusations that prompted my video are still currently available at http://tinyurl.com/HTWWSmears

 

At 0:34 you claim your first "fisking" video "exposed" me for "distorting facts" and "cutting quotes and video" and then claim I "had no response to what [you] said." In fact, I responded within hours with the comments memorialized at http://tinyurl.com/HTWWMisleads, refuting every attack and YOU never replied to those comments

 

At 0:46 you claim my video "distorts the timeline and facts" but you never show any actual distortion, You repeat your claim at 0:55, but, again, you do not show any actual distortion, ignoring my refutation of these arguments from your second "fisking" which I've memorialized at http://tinyurl.com/HTWWMR1

 

At 1:02 you claim I "continuously commented on your channel" though I cannot recall ever posting a comment to your channel page and at 1:05 you claim I sent you "dozens of private messages" when, in FACT, I sent you 19 private messages almost all of which were replies to the 25 private messages you sent me. So YOU are the one who sent DOZENS of private messages, not me. You also initiated 5 of our 7 private message discussion threads. Although, I usually do not reveal private messages sent to me, I make an exception when the other party reveals them first or mischaracterizes them and you did both so, the entire text of ALL our private messages (the 25 from you and the 19 from me) are now available at http://tinyurl.com/HTWWPM

 

At 1:20 you further claim I was "continuously commenting on all of [your] videos" when, in fact, I don't even watch all of your videos but, every time I do, I notice multiple errors and, sometimes, I'll post a comment pointing out your errors. You have also used to post critical comments to my videos, but I always refuted them while you have  never been able to refute any of the errors I've pointed out in your videos. I understand why you might find this situation frustrating, but the fault is not mine but is in the poor quality of the research you do.

 

At 1:29 you claim I was "flat out wrong," but the only example you give is the comment I posted to your video titled "Valerie Jarrett Speaking Truth to Power" in which, in FACT, I correctly pointed out an error in your paraphrase of what Valerie Jarrett said. See http://tinyurl.com/HTWWMR5

 

At 1:52, you claim that I was "constantly lamenting to [you] in private messages that [you weren't] responding to me in a timely fashion" which, again, is not accurate. See http://tinyurl.com/HTWWPM

 

Starting at 2:10, you make a variety of baseless smears against the Obama Administration (e.g. claiming "several of Barack Obama's advisors are openly Marxist," though, my favorite was your claim "they've been making several extremely disturbing statements in the past" which seems to require a time machine to be true).

 

At 2:43, you start off criticizing my video titled "Who Listens to Michele Malkin?" by claiming that the clip from the Glenn Beck program I used came from a segment in which Beck  "had her talk for over 7 minutes because he values her opinion" when, in fact, the clip was from an interview in which both Beck and Malkin talked, neither of them talked for 7 minutes, and Beck never said anything about valuing Malkin's opinion.

 

At 3:19, you claim that you can "clearly tell from the clip that Glenn Beck felt extremely bad for cutting off Michelle Malkin," but, other than your use of the word "clearly" you present no evidence to back up this claim which is contradicted by the fact that Beck didn't have her back after the commercial break despit cutting her off.

 

At 4:15 you claim I "do this [distort] all the time" but you fail to show anything I distorted.

 

At 4:20 you claim I attack Michele Malkin "personally" when I actually attacked the truthfulness of her public  statements as I explain in the part of my video just prior to the clip you showed. You also claim I "deliberately distort the facts about the interview with Glenn Beck," but your only evidence is citing the length of the interview (which contradicts nothing I said in my video) and citing my statement that Malkin's views were "too fringe to get even get the attention of most Republicans" (which is supported by the clip you show at 4:48 in which Malkin specifically admits "the Republicans wouldn't listen").

 

At 5:20 you claim Glenn Beck showed "the 9-12 march on Washington" when, in fact, my video was made before that march and Glenn Beck actually showed an ad promoting his 9-12 event.

 

Finally, at 5:25 you claim I "deliberately distort the facts at the very end" which you repeat at 5:50 but you never explain how or show any facts that I "distorted."

 

Once again, could you please QUOTE what you think I said that was dishonest or a distortion? I saw a lot more factual errors on your part in this latest video, but I'm still waiting for you to QUOTE even ONE thing I said that was false.

 

I hope that helps clear up your misunderstanding and

 

thanks for the video :-)